COMPARISON OF PROJECT INDICATORS USING AGILE OR HYBRID METHODOLOGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21171/ges.v19i54.3740Keywords:
agile methodology, hybrid methodology, software development, project indicators, project managementAbstract
The goal of this study is to determine, by comparing agile and hybrid methodologies, which one presents the best perceived result in relation to the project indicators. A survey was carried out with 102 members of software development projects in Brazil. Data was analyzed using mean comparison. Results show there are differences in code quality and team adaptation to the use of the methodology. In both, the highest value is linked to the agile methodology. The results highlight the differences in code quality and team adaptation to the use of the methodology and for show that, in all other indicators, agile and hybrid methodologies are very similar. Teams can adopt agile or hybrid methodology, choosing the best one for the project, as the results are similar. Project managers using hybrid methodology must be aware of difficulties in adapting the team to the methodology and the quality of the code.
Downloads
References
AGRAWAL, Alka et al. Software security estimation using the hybrid fuzzy ANP-TOPSIS approach: design tactics perspective. Symmetry, v. 12, n. 4, p. 598, 2020.
ARAUJO, Allan RS; DE MOURA, Hermano Perrelli; FRANÇA, César. Complexity within software development projects: an exploratory overview. GESTÃO. Org, v. 13, n. 3, p. 445-455, 2015.
BARLOW, Jordan B. et al. Overview and guidance on agile development in large or-ganizations. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, v. 29, n. 2, p. 25-44, 2011.
BECK, K et al. Manifesto for Agile Software development, 2001. Disponível em: <http://agilemanifest.org >. Acesso em: 2 julho de 2021.
BELL, Thomas E.; THAYER, Thomas A. Software requirements: Are they really a problem?. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Software engineering. 1976. p. 61-68.
BENINGTON, Herbert D. Production of large computer programs. Annals of the History of Computing, v. 5, n. 4, p. 350-361, 1983.
BOEHM, Barry W. A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Com-puter, v. 21, n. 5, p. 61-72, 1988.
BYRNE, Barbara M. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applica-tions, and programming. Routledge, 2016.
CASTELLS, Manuel et al. A sociedade em rede: do conhecimento à acção política, p. 17-30, 2005.
CAJUEIRO, Roberta Liana Pimentel. Manual para elaboração de trabalhos acadêmicos: guia prático do estudante. Rio de Janeiro: Saraiva, 2013.
CRAM, W. Alec; MARABELLI, Marco. Have your cake and eat it too? Simultaneously pursuing the knowledge-sharing benefits of agile and traditional development ap-proaches. Information & Management, v. 55, n. 3, p. 322-339, 2018.
DA SILVA ARAUJO, Joelson Isidro et al. Benefícios e Limitações da Simplicidade em Projetos Inovadores de Software: uma revisão sistemática da literatura. GESTÃO. Org, v. 16, n. 7, p. 279-292, 2018.
DENNIS, A.; WIXON, H. B. Análise e projeto de sistemas. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: LTC, 2011.
FIELD, Andy. Descobrindo a estatística usando o SPSS-5. Penso Editora, 2009.
HAIR, Joseph et al. Fundamentos de métodos de pesquisa em administração. Book-man Companhia Ed, 2005.
GARTNER. Predicts 2022: Consolidated Security Platforms Are the Future. Disponível em: https://info.forcepoint.com/gartner-sse-mq-2022/ . Acesso em: 26 fev. 2023.
HAIR, Joseph F. et al. Análise multivariada de dados. Bookman editora, 2009.
HODA, Rashina; NOBLE, James. Becoming agile: a grounded theory of agile transitions in practice. In: 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). IEEE, 2017. p. 141-151.
KAVITHA, R. K.; AHMED, MS Irfan. Knowledge sharing through pair programming in learning environments: An empirical study. Education and Information Technologies, v. 20, n. 2, p. 319-333, 2015.
KUHRMANN, Marco et al. Hybrid software and system development in practice: water-fall, scrum, and beyond. In: Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Soft-ware and System Process. 2017. p. 30-39.
LARMAN, Craig; BASILI, Victor R. Iterative and incremental developments. a brief histo-ry. Computer, v. 36, n. 6, p. 47-56, 2003.
LAUDON, Kenneth C.; LAUDON, Jane P. Sistemas de informação gerenciais: administrando a empresa digital. Bookman Editora, 2022.
LEIVA MUNDACA, Ignacio; VILLALOBOS ABARCA, Marco. Método ágil híbrido para desarrollar software en dispositivos móviles. Ingeniare. Revista chilena de Ingeniería, v. 23, n. 3, p. 473-488, 2015.
LEVY, P. Cibercultura. Editora 34, 2010.
MALHOTRA, Naresh K. Pesquisa de Marketing-: uma orientação aplicada. Bookman Editora, 2001.
MARTINS, José Carlos Cordeiro. Técnicas para gerenciamento de projetos de software. Brasport, 2007.
NERUR, Sridhar; MAHAPATRA, RadhaKanta; MANGALARAJ, George. Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies. Communications of the ACM, v. 48, n. 5, p. 72-78, 2005.
PRESSMAN, Roger S. Engenharia de Software. Porto Alegre: Editora MCGrawHill, 2011.
RAMOS, Gabriel Russo et al. Comparação entre metodologias de gerenciamento de projetos ágil e tradicional: Um estudo de caso em uma Startup de pequena escala. Brazilian Journal of Development, v. 6, n. 3, p. 15025-15047, 2020.
RANGEL, Mary. Métodos de ensino para a aprendizagem e a dinamização das aulas. Papirus Editora, 2014.
REZENDE, Denis Alcides; ABREU, Aline França de. Tecnologia da informação aplicada a sistemas de informação empresariais. São Paulo: Atlas, v. 3, p. 30, 2000.
ROYCE, Winston W. Managing the development of large software systems: concepts and techniques. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Software Engi-neering. 1987. p. 328-338.
SEYMOUR, Tom et al. The history of project management. International Journal of Management & Information Systems (IJMIS), v. 18, n. 4, p. 233-240, 2014.
SOMMERVILLE, Ian. Engenharia de software. 9. ed. São Paulo: Pearson Addison – Wes-ley, 2011.
SUNGKUR, Roopesh Kevin; RAMASAWMY, Mayvin. Knowledge4Scrum, a novel knowledge management tool for agile distributed teams. Vine, 2014.
THEOCHARIS, Georgios et al. Is water-scrum-fall reality? on the use of agile and tradi-tional development practices. In: International Conference on Product-Focused Soft-ware Process Improvement. Springer, Cham, 2015. p. 149-166.
TURBAN, Efraim et al. Information Technology For Management, (With CD). John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
VERSION ONE. 14th Annual State of Agile Survey. 2020. Disponível em: < https://digital.ai/catalyst-blog/the-14th-annual-state-of-agile-report > . Acesso em: 5, jul de 2021.
YANG, Haibo; HUFF, Sid; STRODE, Diane. Leadership in software development: Com-paring perceptions of agile and traditional project managers. In: AMCIS 2009 Proceed-ings. 2009. p. 184.
ZIELSKE, Malena; HELD, Tobias. Application of agile methods in traditional logistics companies and logistics startups: Results from a German Delphi Study. Journal of Systems and Software, v. 177, p. 110950, 2021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Management & Society Electronic Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
As author of the attached article, I authorize its publication, once approved, in the Revista GES - Gestão e Sociedade. I declare that this article is of my autorship and transfer, in a free and definitive manner, the resulting property rights. I also assume full responsibility for its content.
I authorize GES - Gestão e Sociedade to publish on electronic media, on the Internet or to reproduce by other means that it may use, as well as the edition, reissue, adaptation or distribution of said article.
