INOVAÇÃO ABERTA E TEORIA INSTITUCIONAL
o que a literatura tem a nos dizer?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21171/ges.v18i52.3760Palavras-chave:
Inovação Aberta, Teoria Institucional, Lógicas Institucionais, Mudança Institucional, Estudos OrganizacionaisResumo
Os avanços da abordagem da Inovação Aberta (IA) culminaram em diálogos junto a diversas vertentes dos Estudos Organizacionais. Paralelamente, a Teoria Institucional tem se apresentado promissora na compressão dos contextos de mudanças, lógicas e mecanismos institucionais que integram e desafiam a atuação da IA. Mediante essa perspectiva, o presente artigo buscou sintetizar os estudos que tratam os contextos da IA à luz da Teoria Institucional, apontando uma agenda de pesquisa. A metodologia empregada se pauta em uma revisão integrativa da literatura conforme os procedimentos de Torraco (2016) e Gegenfurther et al. (2009). Quanto aos resultados, observa-se que as principais lógicas institucionais estudadas na IA se caracterizam em lógicas de colaboração, administrativa, social, científica, empresarial e dos direitos autorais. A implementação da IA aponta para desafios, sugerindo uma melhor qualidade de abertura onde os mecanismos institucionais de gestão da relação, da inovação e de conhecimento podem contribuir nesse processo.
Downloads
Referências
ALLEN, D. W. E.; BERG, C., MARKEY-TOWLER; B., NOVAK, M.; POTTS, J. Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy. Research Policy, v. 49, n. 1, 103865, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103865
BELITSKI, M.; CAIAZZA, R.; LEHMANN, E. E. Knowledge frontiers and boundaries in en-trepreneurship research. Small Business Economics, v. 56, n. 2, p. 521–531, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00187-0
BENGTSSON, M. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. Nursing Plus Open. v. 2, p. 8-14, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
BERTELLO, A.; BERNARDI, P.; FERRARIS, A. BRESCIANI, S. Shedding lights on organiza-tional decoupling in publicly funded R&D consortia: An institutional perspective on open innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v.176, 121433, 2022, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121433
BOCQUET, R.; DUBOULOZ, S. Firm openness and managerial innovation: Rebalancing deliberate actions and institutional pressures. Journal of Innovation Economics and Management, v. 32, n. 2, p. 43–74, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.032.0043
CARVALHO, A. D. P.; DA CUNHA, S. K.; LIMA, L. F.; CARSTENS, D. D. The role and contri-butions of institutional theory for the theory of innovation. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, v. 14, n. 3, p. 250-259, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rai.2017.02.001
CHESBROUGH, H. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing, 2003a.
CHESBROUGH, H. The era of open innovation. Sloan Management Review, v. 44, n. 3, p. 35-41, 2003b.
CIESIELSKA, M.; WESTENHOLZ, A. Dilemmas within commercial involvement in open source software. Journal of Organizational Change Management, v. 29, n. 3, p. 344–360, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-04-2013-0058
DAHLANDER, L.; GANN, D. M. How open is innovation? Research Policy, v. 39, n. 6, p. 699–709, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013
GASSMANN, O.; ENKEL, E. Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes. R&D Management Conference (RADMA), Lissabon, July 2004. https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/publications/274
GEELS, F.W. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, v. 33, n. 6-7, p. 897-920, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
GEGENFURTNER, A.; VEERMANS, K.; FESTNER, D.; GRUBER, H. Integrative Literature Re-view: Motivation to Transfer Training: An Integrative Literature Review. Human Re-source Development Review, v. 8, n. 3, p. 403–423, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484309335970
GEORGE, G.; RAO-NICHOLSON, R.; CORBISHLEY, C.; BANSAL, R. Institutional entrepre-neurship, governance, and poverty: Insights from emergency medical response ser-vicesin India. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, v. 32, n. 1, p. 39–65, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-014-9377-9
GIANIODIS, P. T.; ELLIS, S. C.; SECCHI, E. Advancing a typology of open innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, v. 14, n. 4, p. 531–572, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919610002775
HAN, J.; KO, Y. Knowledge exploitation and entrepreneurial activity in a regional inno-vation system: first adaption of RFID at Kumho Tire in GwangJu, Korea. European Plan-ning Studies, v. 25, n. 5, p. 867–885, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1282087
HUIZINGH, K. R. E. Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives. Techno-vation, v. 31, n. 1, p. 2-9, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002
LAMINE, W.; ANDERSON, A.; JACK, S. L.; FAYOLLE, A. Entrepreneurial space and the freedom for entrepreneurship: Institutional settings, policy, and action in the space industry. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, v. 15, p. 309– 340, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1392
LI, X.; YANG, D.; ZHAO, W. Scholars’ identity transition and its impact on spin-offs’ r&d input. Sustainability (Switzerland), v. 13, n. 4, 2358, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042358
LICHTENTHALER, U., LICHTENTHALER, E. A Capability-Based Framework for Open Inno-vation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity. Journal of Management Studies, v. 46, n. 8, p. 1315-1338, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00854.x
LUNDGREN, A.; WESTLUND, H. The openness buzz in the knowledge economy: Towards taxonomy. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, v. 35, n. 6, p. 975–989, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16671312
MAHDAD, M.; DE MARCO, C. E.; PICCALUGA, A.; DI MININ, A. Harnessing adaptive capacity to close the pandora’s box of open innovation. Industry and Innovation, v. 27, n. 3, p. 264–284, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1633910
MEYER, R.E.; HÖLLERER, M.A. Does Institutional Theory Need Redirecting? Journal of Management Studies, v. 51, p.1221-1233, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12089
MEYER J. W.; ROWAN B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myths and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, v. 83, n. 2, p. 340-363, 1977. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2778293%20
MORTARA, L.; MINSHALL, T. 2011. How do large multinational companies implement open innovation? Technovation, v. 31, n. 10-11, p. 586-597, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.05.002
OGUGUO, P. C.; FREITAS, I. M. B.; GENET, C. Multilevel institutional analyses of firm benefits from R&D collaboration. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 151, n. 119841, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119841
ORTIZ, J.; REN, H.; LI, K.; ZHANG, A. Construction of open innovation ecology on the internet: A case study of Xiaomi (China) using institutional logic. Sustainability (Switzer-land), v. 11, n. 3225, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113225
PACHURA, P. Spaces, Innovations and Institutional Theory. In: INTERNATIONAL CON-FERENCE ON TECHNOLOGY AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, V, 2020, San Jose, CA/USA. Vir-tual (ICTE), p. 1-5, 2020. DOI: 10.1109/ICTE-V50708.2020.9113787
PACI, A. M.; LALLE, C.; CHIACCHIO, M. S. Knowledge Management For Open Innova-tion: Collaborative Mapping Of Needs And Competencies. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, v. 11, n. 1, 2010. http://www.tlainc.com/articl212.htm
PALACIOS, M.; MARTINEZ-CORRAL, A.; NISAR, A.; GRIJALVO, M. Crowdsourcing and organizational forms: Emerging trends and research implications. Journal of Business Research, v. 69, n. 5, p. 1834–1839, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.065
POETZ, M. K.; SCHREIER, M. The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? Journal of Product Innovation Man-agement, v. 29, n. 2, p. 245–256, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00893.x
RADNEJAD, A. B.; VREDENBURG, H.; WOICESHYN, J. Meta-organizing for open innova-tion under environmental and social pressures in the oil industry. Technovation, v. 66–67, p. 14–27, 2017. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.01.002
SCHWEITZER, F.; PALMIÉ, M.; GASSMANN, O.; KAHLERT, J.; ROETH, T. Open innovation for institutional entrepreneurship: how incumbents induce institutional change to ad-vance autonomous driving. R&D Management, v. 52, p. 465-483, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12490
SCOTT, W. R . Instituições e organizações: ideias e interesses. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2007.
TORRACO, R. J. Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, v. 15, n. 4, p. 404-428, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606
TRAN, H. T.; SANTARELLI, E.; WEI, W. X. Open innovation knowledge management in transition to market economy: integrating dynamic capability and institutional theory. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, v. 31, n. 7, p. 575- 603, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1841942
TRANEKJER, T. L.; KNUDSEN, M. P. The (unknown) providers to other firms’ new product development: What’s in it for them? Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 29, n. 6, p. 986–99, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00974.x
TSAI, C; AHN, J. M. How do institutional effects shape open innovation adoption? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2163383
TSINOPOULOS, C.; SOUSA, C. M. P.; YAN, J. Process Innovation: Open Innovation and the Moderating Role of the Motivation to Achieve Legitimacy. Journal of Product In-novation Management, v. 35, n. 1, p. 27–48, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12374
VAN DE VRANDE, W.; VANHAVERBEKE, V.; GASSMANN, O. Broadening the scope of open innovation: past research, current state and future directions. Int. J. Technology Management, v. 52, n. 3/4, p. 221-235, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2010.035974
VANHAVERBEKE, W.; CHESBROUGH, H. A classification of open innovation and open business models. In: CHESBROUGH, H.; VANHAVERBEKE, W.; WEST, J. (Eds.). New fron-tiers in open innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, p. 50–68.
WALLIN, M. W., VON KROGH, G. Organizing for Open Innovation: Focus on the Integra-tion of Knowledge. Organizational Dynamics, v. 39, n.2, p. 145-154, 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2010.01.010
WATSON, R.; WILSON, H. N.; SMART, P.; MACDONALD, E. K. Harnessing Difference: A Capability-Based Framework for Stakeholder Engagement in Environmental Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 35, n. 2, p. 254–279, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12394
XIE, Y.; XU, K.; HUANG, J. Q. How do innovation intermediaries influence outbound open innovation in china? a moderated mediation mechanism. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, IEEE, Singapore, 2020, p. 344-348, DOI 10.1109/IEEM45057.2020.9309959.
ZHENG, C.; HU, M.-C. An exploration of the application of universities as artificial institu-tional entrepreneurs: The case of China. Journal of Public Affairs, v. 18, n. 18:e1697, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1697
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Gestão e Sociedade
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Como autor do artigo em anexo autorizo sua publicação, uma vez aprovado, na Revista GES - Gestão e Sociedade. Declaro ser de minha autoria o referido artigo e cedo, a título gratuito e em caráter definitivo, os direitos patrimoniais dele decorrentes. Assumo ainda inteira responsabilidade por seu conteúdo.
Autorizo a GES - Gestão e Sociedade a publicar em meio eletrônico, na Internet ou a reproduzir por outros meios que venha a utiliza, bem como a edição, reedição, adaptação ou distribuição do referido artigo.
