Uso da internet: análise do relacionamento entre tipos de atividades, fatores de rejeição e condições
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21171/ges.v14i2.2980Palavras-chave:
Exclusão digital, Desigualdades digitais, Uso da Internet, Condições sociodemográficas, Aspectos cognitivosResumo
O objetivo principal do trabalho foi explorar o relacionamento entre gênero, idade e escolaridade e os tipos de atividades e fatores de rejeição ao uso da Internet. Por meio de revisão de literatura e dados secundários disponibilizados pelo Centro de Estudos sobre as Tecnologias da Informação e Comunicação (CETIC) foi possível verificar que esses aspectos sociodemográficos representam fonte incompleta para entendimento do uso da Internet. Do ponto de vista de práticas de gestão e de políticas públicas, sugere-se a necessidade de repensar a forma com que o fenômeno de uso da Internet deve ser enquadrado. Ou seja, entende-se necessário focar em aspectos cognitivos.
Downloads
Referências
AGARWAL, R.; ANIMESH, A.; PRASAD, K. Social Interactions and the “Digital Divide”: Explaining Variations in Internet Use. Information Systems Research, v. 20, n. 2, p. 277–294, 2009.
BIMBER, B. Measuring the Gender Gap on the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, v. 81, n. 3, p. 868–876, 2000.
BLANK, G.; GROSELJ, D. Dimensions of Internet use: amount, variety, and types. Information, Communication & Society, v. 17, n. 4, p. 417–435, 2014.
BONFADELLI, H. The Internet and Knowledge Gaps: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. European Journal of Communication, v. 17, n. 1, p. 65–84, 2002.
BRANDTZÆG, P. B.; HEIM, J.; KARAHASANOVIC, A. Understanding the new digital divide: a typology of Internet users in Europe. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v. 69, n. 3, p. 123–138, 2011.
BUCHINSKY, M. Recent Advances in Quantile Regression Models: A Practical Guideline for Empirical Research. The Journal of Human Resources, v. 33, n. 1, p. 88, 1998.
CARPENTER, B. D.; BUDAY, S. Computer use among older adults in a naturally occurring retirement community. Computers in Human Behavior, Including the Special Issue: Education and Pedagogy with Learning Objects and Learning Designs. v. 23, n. 6, p. 3012–3024, 2007.
CASTELLS, M. The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2001.
CETIC. Pesquisa sobre o uso das tecnologias da informação e comunicação no Brasil 2012: TIC domicílios e TIC empresas. São Paulo: Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil, 2013.
COLLEY, A.; MALTBY, J. Impact of the Internet on our lives: Male and female personal perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, Including the Special Issue: Internet Empowerment. v. 24, n. 5, p. 2005–2013, 2008.
CRESCI, M. K.; YARANDI, H. N.; MORRELL, R. W. Pro-Nets Versus No-Nets: Differences in Urban Older Adults’ Predilections for Internet Use. Educational Gerontology, v. 36, n. 6, p. 500–520, 2010.
DIMAGGIO, P. et al. Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use. In: Social Inequality. Social Inequality. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2004.
DONAT, E.; BRANDTWEINER, R.; KERSCHBAUM, J. Attitudes and the Digital Divide : Attitude Measurement as Instrument to Predict Internet Usage. Informing Science, v. 12, p. 37–56, 2009.
DRABOWICZ, T. Gender and digital usage inequality among adolescents: A comparative study of 39 countries. Computers & Education, v. 74, p. 98–111, 2014.
ERCEG-HURN, D. M.; MIROSEVICH, V. M. Modern robust statistical methods: An easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. American Psychologist, v. 63, n. 7, p. 591–601, 2008.
EYNON, R.; HELSPER, E. Adults learning online: Digital choice and/or digital exclusion? New Media & Society, v. 13, n. 4, p. 534–551, 2011.
FERRO, E.; HELBIG, N. C.; GIL-GARCIA, J. R. The role of IT literacy in defining digital divide policy needs. Government Information Quarterly, v. 28, n. 1, p. 3–10, 2011.
GERPOTT, T. J.; THOMAS, S. Empirical research on mobile Internet usage: A meta-analysis of the literature. Telecommunications Policy, v. 38, n. 3, p. 291–310, abr. 2014.
HAIGHT, M.; QUAN-HAASE, A.; CORBETT, B. A. Revisiting the digital divide in Canada: the impact of demographic factors on access to the internet, level of online activity, and social networking site usage. Information, Communication & Society, v. 17, n. 4, p. 503–519, 2014.
HAIR, J. F. et al. Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th. ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall International, 2005.
HARAMBAM, J.; AUPERS, S.; HOUTMAN, D. The Contentious Gap. Information, Communication & Society, v. 16, n. 7, p. 1093–1114, 2013.
HARGITTAI, E. Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet Skills and Uses among Members of the “Net Generation”. Sociological Inquiry, v. 80, n. 1, p. 92–113, 2010.
HARGITTAI, E.; HINNANT, A. Digital Inequality Differences in Young Adults’ Use of the Internet. Communication Research, v. 35, n. 5, p. 602–621, 2008.
HARGITTAI, E.; SHAFER, S. Differences in Actual and Perceived Online Skills: The Role of Gender. Social Science Quarterly, v. 87, n. 2, p. 432–448, 2006.
HARGITTAI, E.; SHAW, A. Digitally Savvy Citizenship: The Role of Internet Skills and Engagement in Young Adults’ Political Participation around the 2008 Presidential Election. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, v. 57, n. 2, p. 115–134, 2013.
HELSPER, E. J.; EYNON, R. Distinct skill pathways to digital engagement. European Journal of Communication, v. 28, n. 6, p. 696–713, 2013.
HELSPER, E. J.; REISDORF, B. C. A Quantitative Examination of Explanations for Reasons for Internet Nonuse. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, v. 16, n. 2, p. 94–99, 2013.
HILL, R.; BEYNON-DAVIES, P.; WILLIAMS, M. D. Older people and internet engagement: Acknowledging social moderators of internet adoption, access and use. Information Technology & People, v. 21, n. 3, p. 244–266, 2008.
HOFFMANN, C. P.; LUTZ, C.; MECKEL, M. Content creation on the Internet: a social cognitive perspective on the participation divide. Information, Communication & Society, v. 18, n. 6, p. 696–716, 2015.
HOWARD, P. E. N.; RAINIE, L.; JONES, S. Days and Nights on the Internet The Impact of a Diffusing Technology. American Behavioral Scientist, v. 45, n. 3, p. 383–404, 2001.
KIM, Y. S. Reviewing and Critiquing Computer Learning and Usage Among Older Adults. Educational Gerontology, v. 34, n. 8, p. 709–735, 2008.
LIVINGSTONE, S.; HELSPER, E. J. Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, v. 9, n. 4, p. 671–696, 2007.
MOSSBERGER, K.; TOLBERT, C. J.; STANSBURY, M. Virtual inequality: beyond the digital divide. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press, 2003.
MOTA, F. P. B.; BELLINI, C. G. P. Peças e Engrenagens do Uso da Internet. In: Twenty-third Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), 2017.
MOTA, F. P. B. et al. Habilidades e Atitudes para Uso da Internet: estudo com adolescentes e jovens adultos. In: Seminários em Administração (SEMEAD), 2018.
ONO, H.; ZAVODNY, M. Gender and the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, v. 84, n. 1, p. 111–121, 2003.
PEACOCK, S. E.; KÜNEMUND, H. Senior citizens and Internet technology. European Journal of Ageing, v. 4, n. 4, p. 191–200, 2007.
ROBINSON, L. et al. Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, v. 18, n. 5, p. 569–582, 2015.
ROGERS, E. Diffusion of innovations. 5. ed. New York, New York, USA: Free Press, 2003.
SLEGERS, K.; VAN BOXTEL, M. P. J.; JOLLES, J. Computer use in older adults: Determinants and the relationship with cognitive change over a 6 year episode. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 28, n. 1, p. 1–10, 2012.
VAN DEURSEN, A.; VAN DIJK, J. Using the Internet: Skill related problems in users’ online behavior. Interacting with Computers, v. 21, n. 5–6, p. 393–402, 2009.
VAN DEURSEN, A.; VAN DIJK, J. Measuring Internet Skills. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, v. 26, n. 10, p. 891–916, 2010.
VAN DEURSEN, A.; VAN DIJK, J. The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, v. 16, n. 3, p. 507–526, 2014a.
VAN DEURSEN, A.; VAN DIJK, J. Modeling Traditional Literacy, Internet Skills and Internet Usage: An Empirical Study. Interacting with Computers, p. 1–14, 2014b.
VAN DEURSEN, A.; VAN DIJK, J.; TEN KLOOSTER, P. Increasing inequalities in what we do online: A longitudinal cross sectional analysis of Internet activities among the Dutch population (2010 to 2013) over gender, age, education, and income. Telematics and Informatics, v. 32, n. 2, p. 259–272, 2015.
VAN DIJK, J. The deepening divide: inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks: Sage Pub, 2005.
VAN LAAR, E. et al. 21st-century digital skills instrument aimed at working professionals: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Telematics and Informatics, v. 35, n. 8, p. 2184–2200, dez. 2018.
VAN LAAR, E. VAN et al. The Sequential and Conditional Nature of 21st-Century Digital Skills. International Journal of Communication, v. 13, n. 0, p. 26, 28 jul. 2019.
WAGNER, N.; HASSANEIN, K.; HEAD, M. Computer use by older adults: A multi-disciplinary review. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 26, n. 5, p. 870–882, 2010.
WARSCHAUER, M. Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Cambridge, 2003.
WILCOX, R. R. How many discoveries have been lost by ignoring modern statistical methods? American Psychologist, v. 53, n. 3, p. 300, 1998.
YU, K.; LU, Z.; STANDER, J. Quantile regression: applications and current research areas. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), v. 52, n. 3, p. 331–350, 2003.
ZILLIEN, N.; HARGITTAI, E. Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Types of Internet Usage. Social Science Quarterly, v. 90, n. 2, p. 274–291, 2009.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Como autor do artigo em anexo autorizo sua publicação, uma vez aprovado, na Revista GES - Gestão e Sociedade. Declaro ser de minha autoria o referido artigo e cedo, a título gratuito e em caráter definitivo, os direitos patrimoniais dele decorrentes. Assumo ainda inteira responsabilidade por seu conteúdo.
Autorizo a GES - Gestão e Sociedade a publicar em meio eletrônico, na Internet ou a reproduzir por outros meios que venha a utiliza, bem como a edição, reedição, adaptação ou distribuição do referido artigo.
